There are many definitions for the word “myth”. Many would
want to define “myth” very narrowly, being only concerned with
gods or supernatural beings, or unscientific explanations of how the natural
world came to be, only applicable to a pre-modern society where faith and
spiritualty was unchallenged. In our modern culture it seems many have
lost contact with older mythologies and the religious beliefs that informed
them, so much so that in common parlance the word myth is substituted for
lie. (Doniger, 1999, p.1; Campbell and Kennedy, 2001, p. 2)
Many perceive myths as quaint and removed from our ordinary lives. It is true
that many people would reject the older myths associated with earlier religions
as misrepresentations, seeing them merely as pretty stories, so in that sense
much of our society is demythologised. Creation tales from around the world,
whether from India or Australia, no longer find large numbers of true believers.
The gods and goddesses of Greece and Rome no longer have many devotees. These
myths, once part of religious sacred texts that informed daily ritual no longer
serve that purpose for us. So, many would say that the modern world is demythologised,
with no myths to guide us. Many people especially in the Western world reject
all religion as a lie or at the very least are agnostic. They would say that
these stories have no power.
However, it is a misconception that the members of Greek or Roman society (or
probably any society) accepted the myths at face value. ”Neo-Platonists,
and Stoics as well as Epicureans agreed that myths were not to be taken literally...tough
minded reformers explained them away as fictions designed to mislead the credulous
, superstitious multitude” (Bidney,1965, p4) So right from so-called mythological
times demythologising had begun.
“in the course o time fewer and fewer members of society may believe in
a myth and especially in a period of rapid cultural change an entire belief system
and its mythology can be discredited . Even in cultural isolation there may be
some sceptics who do not accept the traditional system of belief” (Bascan,
1984, p.13)
If we are to follow the belief that myth is only to do with religious ritual
then it might seem that many in our modern world have little to do with the belief
systems that bear up that kind of myth. However, there are still followers of
many religions throughout the world and the adherents of these believe the myths
associated with these. There are over 4,200 religions according to Adherents.com
(Hunter, 2002, home page)
“I would say that roughly 83 to 90% of the world's population professes
a belief in God or a similarly understood higher power(s).” (Hunter, 2002
FAQ)
In our own backyard:
The ACS (Australian Community Survey) reveals that most Australians believe in
God or a spirit, higher power or life-force (74%) and around 40% accept conventional
Christian beliefs such as life after death, the resurrection and divinity of
Jesus. Two-thirds of Australians claim that a spiritual life is important to
them and 33% pray or meditate at least weekly. (NCLS, 2002, p.1)
Joseph Campbell puts it this way “half the people in the world think that
the metaphors of their religious traditions, for example, are facts. And the
other half contends that they are not facts at all.”(Campbell and Kennedy,
2001, p. 2)
If we also we use a wider definition to define myth as any stories told by the “folk” or
people that resonate with groups of people then our present society is still
very much involved in using, promulgating and believing in myths.
The power of the stories or ancient myths, though no longer necessarily linked
to a belief in the associated religion, is still apparent. Myths and sacred stories
like legends, fairy tales, folktales and folklore and are told and re-told and
find echo throughout the world. Psychologists like Jung point to these stories
and say they reflect archetypes of our collective unconscious. (Jung, 1936, par
87 – 110) that find echo in our psyche so that whenever we think we escape
them they re-appear I another form
John Carroll in his book The Western Dreaming: the western world is dying for
want of a story (2001) contends that the myths western society is finding for
itself echo the stories of old, and that some are finding not only the stories
but the religious truths behind those stories. In his chapter on “God is
Dead”, after pointing out the influence of Kierkegaard and Nietzsche he
states:
God is indeed gone, but the force of the sacred continued to drive through the
human condition. A religious imperative seems to be innate, a sort of third instinct,
apart from the eros and aggression, reaching for the beyond (2001, p27)
He then traces the stories we see reflected again and again in the stories society
keeps telling. There is “Magdalene” (Carroll, 2001, Chapter 2), the
reformed sinner: Princess Diana as the successful; Marilyn Munroe the failed. “Magdalene
is the archetype of human metamorphosis, of every truly changed life” (p
46) Carroll makes the point that it is the contrast of past mistakes and future
goodness that captures the imagination. ”Mother Teresa’s death was
met by public indifference in the West, as if to say: You are not our ideal.
We do not want to be you. The world denying self on its own is not right. It’s
Diana we love” (p.61)
I think the success of the story of Paul’s transformation and the hundreds
of similar testimonies in churches and mission are a reflection of the strength
of this hunger for a story or myth of possible reformation. The dramatic change
from drug addict to pastor or preacher is very common.
Then there is “The Hero” (Carroll, Chapter 3): the Western hero from
the films; the “honest cop” of police and detective shows on television
and the football stars of our favourite team. Carroll traces our hero stories
from The Iliad and the Odyssey: central tales of the western tradition.
Many of the myths we create and believe in today are in the tradition of the
story of the hero so common in traditional myths. We idealise a few people, finding
in their lives the magic and grandeur once allocated to Ulysses or Arthur. Ordinary
people finding in themselves extra-ordinary heroism is incredibly attractive.
The fire fighters and police and other emergency workers of the September 11
tragedy are the stories most often told, re-told and remembered.
Of course, alongside the adulation is the concurrent iconoclastic fervour, and
finding the tragic flaw in the hero. JFK once was regarded as a hero by millions,
so much so that a generation (even outside the United States) marked his passing
by remembering where they were when they heard the news of his death. His status
was brought low by a frenzy of media stories that relate his sexual histories
and other human failings. But his flaws emphasise his heroic status.
Sport stars and film stars who excel and have the requisite charisma or looks
claim our attention. For a time we idealise them, follow their careers and admire
them, see them as people apart who are somehow special and beyond the petty tyrannies
of everyday life. Sometimes, their worship can survive scandal and crimes we
would not forgive those around us. Then, at least for some, the inevitable fall
of the hero comes and the myth is over, ordinary people no longer able to match
our conception of the hero.
Few of our contemporaries can bear the weight of undivided adulation. Some can
bear the halo longer. Mother Theresa, Martin Luther King and Nelson Mandela are
a few who have lasted better than most. Sometimes a story transcends the ordinary
adulation to weather the scandals and cold light of reality. But, if there appears
to be no tragic flaw then the myth lacks power to engage.
“Soul-mate Love” (Carroll, 2001, Chapter 4) is another story that
westerners tell. In Plato’s Symposium we have the germ of this myth but
it came to fruition in mediaeval tales. Shakespeare and the novelists throughout
the western tradition continued the myth. Popular songs and romantic movies reflect
these tales today.
The inspiration of the stories of courtly love is said to influence society and
the conceptions of love and marriage to this day. (Johnson, 1983) Young girls
(and maybe boys) still look for that one perfect lover who above all fulfils
all their needs. Romance novels (Mills and Boon variety) and romantic comedies
on television and movies reflect the myth. The cold light of everyday life often
does not bear the weight of such expectation.
“The Mother” (Carroll, 2001, Chapter 5) comes rather late in western
tradition, beginning mostly from the stories of Mary and finding expression in
the unrealisable myth of supermum who can (or should) do everything.
This myth ranges from the mawkish and sentimental of greeting cards to the earth
mother of new age witches to the all powerful, all demanding, problem solver
of television comedies.
Vocation (Carroll, 2001, Chapter 6) is the story that defines our lives: where
the job a person does is their reason for being. Calvin and the Second Reformation
helped imbed this into our society. The tax collector Matthew and Moses are the
archetypes here.
And it is the failure of being able to achieve this myth that has power. I think
this myth is the reason that instead of reaching the golden predictions of the
seventies we are not a leisured society where everyone works only a few hours
a day. Instead we have a situation where some people work incredibly long hours
for little thanks with much detriment to the family and others in society can
not obtain work at all. Also, those who are not in paid employment face disdain,
ridicule and contempt whether this situation is from choice to care for children,
elderly or disabled; or retirement, or volunteer work or inability to obtain
employment.
Then there is “Fate” (Carroll, 2001, Chapter 7), a belief that we
have no control over our destiny, that everything is pre-determined. Oedipus
the King is the story that was told again by Freud who thought “this legend
to be archetypal of family drama” (Carroll, 2001, p. 151); revived again
by Nietzsche’s theory of tragedy (Carroll, 2001, p. 152) and a belief in
Necessity somehow rules our modern lives.
A related myth to this is a modern belief in astrology where somehow the positions
of the stars and planets can predict our lives. Many religiously read the horoscope
in the newspaper everyday, even though they might say “I don’t really
believe in it.” A similar revival also of Tarot cards, ouija boards, Celtic
runes argues a belief that people have no control over their lives, that blind
fate or external force is in charge. Even some Christians argue that God has
pre-destined their faith, so no action or in-action, belief or non-belief actually
changes their position as “saved” or not.
“The Genesis of Evil” (Carroll, 2001, Chapter 8) reaches from the
story of Genesis, the search for knowledge “the means for metamorphosis
out of brute existence” (Carroll, 2001, p.175), not at first good and evil
but boredom. “Is this all? sows the seed of evil” (Carroll, 2001,
p.177) And alongside Eve is Judas, the betrayer who fails because of his lust
for power.
These myths of evil echo again and again through the stories of western people.
The weight of evil placed on women in the story of the Fall reverberates throughout
western history, and is seen .as the beginning of many evils of it’s own:
as an excuse for sexism by men, and a cause of low self-esteem by women.
“Theologically, Ruether analyses the Fall, the alienation between humanity
and God, in terms of sexism, which she sees as beginning in self-alienation,
expressed as estrangement between the self and the body”(Tulip,1990, p.
239)
And the calumny of the worst punishment goes to the Betrayer. In the ninth circle
of hell the very worst punishment is kept for the betrayers, and the very harshest
of all for Judas.
"That one," said my guide,
"Who suffers the greatest punishment,
Is Judas Iscariot” (Dante, 2000 trans Zimmerman, Canto 34)
These myths are in some cases the means of demythologising. One of the most powerful
myths of today is that of the supremacy of science. The “story” that
science has all the answers, can solve all problems, knows the secrets of the
universe has meant that the other stories of explanation have been ousted. The
contention is that once we understand more about the world we no longer need
myths. “mythology began to lose one of its more crucial powers — the
ability to explain.” (Appelcline, 2002, p.1)
With the advent of ‘science’, the language of story to explain life
was put aside, as being somewhat childish, certainly not modern, and possibly
primitive. As modern peoples, we had been freed by science and no longer needed
to story our lives... (Myths among us, 2002, p.1)
But scientists with their new theories each decade, are merely substituting their
myths for the old ones, no surer of the truth than primitive societies.
But, we are incurable story tellers. And the stories that have power are ones
that try to explain our very being. The story of evolution means creation stories
of other cultures have been deposed. Believers in the story of evolution reject
the “myths” of religion; believers in creation deny the “lie” of
evolution: each advocate convinced of their own territory of truth.
We commonly believe the hype about technology so much that we see it as the saviour
to humankind; it has acquired the status that magic once had, where the initiated
are the only ones able to dispense the solutions. ”the citizen, confronted
by bewildering bigness and complexity, finds it necessary to defer on all matters
to those who know better.” (Roszak, 1973, p. 203) But this myth is only
that a story we tell ourselves to give power to the magician...in this case the
holder of the power of technology.
Film makers retell the old stories over and over to willing audiences. “Many
of the myths of our time come from Hollywood, for Hollywood is as much a myth
factory as it is a dream factory” (Doniger, 1999, p.1).
We can see in our movies all of the traditional myths. We see heroes in almost
all Westerns, Lord of the Rings, Excalibur; Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone;
the quest as in Star Wars, Lord of the Rings; the journey in Easy Rider, Thelma
and Louise, Lord of the Rings.
Many film makers mine the treasure trove of traditional myths, partly because
they are out of copyright but also because the stories work!
“The entire Star Wars universe was created out of his seminal reading of
Campbell's The Hero with a Thousand Faces.”(Arya, 2002, p.1)
There is also truth in Doniger’s contention, “A myth is, above all,
a story that is believed to be true, that people continue to believe even in
the face of massive evidence to the contrary”. (1999, p.1) And if we examine
this definition from Keene and Fox (1989, p. xi):
“[Myth refers to] an intricate set of interlocking stories, rituals, rites,
and customs that inform and give the pivotal sense of meaning and direction to
a person, family, community, or culture", we can see that even beyond these
myths that reflect stories told from the past there are other stories too that
have the weight of myth that we are creating today. I would assert that the word “myth” carries
a wider meaning and includes in its ambit any folk stories that are transmitted
by a community, which have influence on their attitudes, values and way of life.
I would like to offer one example from contemporary Australia: the story of ANZAC.
For modern Australians, one would say the ANZAC story should have no resonance.
After all, all the Australian protagonists are dead. The former myths of fine
warriors and the glory of war have faded. The “real” stories of Gallipoli
have been told and we know about the sheer stupidity, mistakes and foolishness
of the bungled battles. However, there is a very real myth that has developed
around ANZAC. The realities of history pale into insignificance alongside the
power of the story. Australians, whether they “really” believe the
history or not, find meaning and power in the tales of Gallipoli. They tell again
and again how the Australia spirit was forged at Anzac Cove. Concepts of sacrificial
mateship, of friendly egalitarianism, of laconic humour, of “she’ll
be right” optimism , of the inventive “making do”, of heroism
under fire, of eventual victory out of defeat, of casual defiance of authority,
of “pommy” betrayal are reiterated.
Young people whose great or great-great grandfathers died in the mud of Gallipoli
trek to Turkey and cry for the tragedy of needless lives lost. (I received a
sms message from Gallipoli from a young acquaintance:”what a stupid waste!”)
Dawn services throng with families taking part in a ritual for heroes. A myth
is born. To remember a muddy bloody battle fought so long ago, the folk of today
have made a sacred memory of those heroes who died. The reality may be different
than the myth: not all soldiers were brave or nor was the battlefield necessarily
an egalitarian place except in the equality of death (Blair, 2000, p.1). Nevertheless
the myth has power and like all myths it does have an effect on people’s
lives.
The very fact that the story is not historically true may be it’s influence. “they
[myths] have a power that transcends inaccuracy , even depends on it” (Dowden,
1992, P.3)
Blair’s attempt to demythologise is for now ineffectual. When it or other
attempts are made it will only succeed when a more another myth takes it place.
As Sproul says when speaking of challenges to Genesis stories:
What is essential to understand is that they have been challenged not by new
facts but by new attitudes towards facts; they have been challenged by new myths”((1979,
p.1)
In the same way our society has many myths that are told and re-told, that echo
and influence, inform and are underlie the beliefs and attitudes of everyday
life. We demythologise it seems in order that we have space to create new myths.
References
1) Appelcline, Shannon (2002) Modern Myths, Part Two: An Overview from Citizen
Kane to Spider-Man [online] Available WWW: http://www.skotos.net/articles/TTnT_71.shtml
(Accessed 2002, 30 May)
2) Arya, Rohit (2002) The Matrix as Mythological Construct [online] Available
WWW:http://www.indiayogi.com/website/phase3/mythology/matrix.asp (Accessed 2002,2
June)
3) Bascom William (1984) “The Forms of Folklore: Prose Narratives” In
Dundas, Alan Sacred Narratives: Readings in the Theory of Myth (pp. 5-29)Berkeley:
University of California
4) Bidney, David (1965) “Myth, Symbolism and Truth” In Seboek, Thomas
(Ed.) Myth: A Symposium (pp.3-24) Bloomington: Indiana University Press
5) Blair, Dale 2000 Challenging the Anzac Legend: The Sixteenth Roger Joyce Memorial
Lecture [online] Available WWW: http://home.vicnet.net.au/~histinst/anzac_legend.htm
(Accessed 2002,2 June)
6) Campbell, Joseph, Eugene C. Kennedy (Ed.) (2001) Thou Art That: Transforming
Religious Metaphor Novato, CA: New World Library.
7) Carroll, John (2001) The Western Dreaming: the western world is dying for
want of a story Sydney: Harper Collins
8) Dante Alighieri, Rhymed Translation by Seth Zimmerman “Canto XXXIV” The
Inferno of Dante Alighieri [online] Available WWW:http://home.earthlink.net/~zimls/HELLXXXIV.html
(Accessed 2002, 2 June)
9) Doniger, Wendy (Spring 1999) “In the World: Myths from the Dream Factory” Radcliffe
Quarterly [online] Available WWW: http://www.radcliffe.edu/quarterly/199901/world-myt_fro.html
(Accessed 2002,30 May)
10) Dowden, K (1992) Myth and Mythology: The Uses of Greek Mythology London:Routledge.
11) Hunter, Preston (2002) Welcome to adherents.com [online] Available WWW: http://www.adherents.com/
(Accessed 2002,30 May)
12) Hunter, Preston (2002) FAQ [online] Available WWW: http://www.adherents.com/
(Accessed 2002,30 May)
13) Johnson, R.A. (1983)”Approaching the Wine” The Psychology of
Courtly Love London: Arkana
14) Jung, Carl Edited and translated by Gerhard Adler and R.F.C. Hull (1936) “The
Archetypes and the collective unconscious; Definition” Collected Works
Vol 9.1, pars.87-110 Princeton: Princeton University Press
15) Keene, Sam and Valley-Fox, Anne. (1989)"Your Mythic Journey Finding
Meaning in Your Life Through Writing and Storytelling," Los Angeles,: Jeremy
P. Tarcher
16) Myths among us (May 2002) Issue No.19 [online] Available WWW: http://www.mythsamongus.com/
(Accessed 2002,30 May)
17) National Church Life Survey (2002) How Christian are Australians? [online]
Available WWW: http://www.ncls.org.au//pages.asp?page=929&sao=1 (Accessed
2002,2 June)
18) Roszak, Theodor E (1973) An extract from “Technocracy’s Children” from
The making of a counter culture In Dixon, Bernard (ed) (1989) From Creation to
Chaos: Classic Writings in Science (pp. 202-203) London: Cardinal
19) Sproul, Barbara. C Primal Myths: Creating the World London: Rider
20) Tulip, Marie (1990) “Religion” in Gunew, Sneja (Ed.) Feminist
Knowledge: Critique and Construct (pp.229- 270) London: Routledge |
|
|