![]() home > publishing > aarl > 33.1 > full.text > AARL issue 33.1 |
|||
Virtual libraries: service realitiesJan Novak Abstract: From the global environment to the local, information and communication technologies are changing our lives and changing the way libraries do business. No longer are libraries an arcane world of their own. Every major trend impacting on today's society is also impacting on libraries. Today's environment is one of paradox: there is decentralisation within globalism, fragmentation within mass culture, and customisation within mass manufacturing. Boundaries are breaking down: between disciplines, among industries, and between suppliers and customers. Dominant functions and processes in the information age are increasingly organised around networks, and this enables virtual services to come together in partnerships and alliances. Process has become as important as product as the knowledge era increases emphasis on abstraction; it is an age dominated by ideas, concepts, and experience - and services are a form of process. What are some of the client service issues to be considered when transiting to a virtual library situation? Before discussing client service in an electronic environment, I would first like to take a brief look at our world: the world in which our institutions exist; the world in which we and our users will continue to operate. Michael J Mazarr[1] focuses upon the transitional nature of society in the knowledge era, and identifies several themes which are relevant to libraries:
The first theme is paradox, which he identifies as the single overriding aspect of the social transformation under way today. He goes on to say that the knowledge era is a time of inconsistency and ambiguity; that there is decentralisation within globalism; fragmentation within mass culture; expanded individualism within stronger community; and absolutism within relativism. Society's complex transitional state makes it difficult to identify uncomplicated trends; and there is a central paradox for libraries, which are finding that the increased requirement of our customers for simplicity of interaction with our organisation creates greater complexity for us as managers. The second aspect is a blurring of boundaries: between disciplines, industries, and social enterprises. Things we were accustomed to seeing as highly distinct endeavours, such as acquisitions and cataloguing, or even circulation and reference services, become, if not one and the same, at least much more alike than they have been. Reengineering and reorganising have become commonplace in libraries that had seen little major conceptional organisational change for decades. The inter-industrial phenomenon is causing businesses to think not about what industry they are in, but about what core competencies they have to offer, and what industries they could enter. The other major factor of significance is that boundaries between disciplines are less important than the threads that connect them. The third theme described is that of networks, systems, and holistic thinking. 'Dominant functions and processes in the information age are increasingly organised around networks.'[2] Nowhere are networks more significant than when increasingly virtual corporations come together in temporary partnerships and alliances. So we have come from interdisciplinary blurring of boundaries to networked interdependency. The implication here is that processes produced by a networked era cannot be understood as individual activities or singular events but must be thought of as systems, interactive sets of enterprises that move forward in a coevolutionary pattern with one another. The fourth theme Mazarr discusses is process not product; becoming not being; experience not thing. The knowledge era is a time dominated by ideas and concepts, and as such, reduces emphasis on tangible things and increases the emphasis on abstraction. The dominance of process and experience manifests in a number of ways. Services, for example, are a form of process rather than a specific product. Education has become a lifelong process rather than a one-time event. The responsibilities of academic libraries to institutional alumni or continuing education participants need to be redefined, as these activities become increasingly established in our society. Moreover, there is the concept that the overall quality of a library can often be deduced from the quality of its processes. This concept gives rise to program performance evaluation, operational performance targets, benchmarking and best practice. As well, in an era of rapid change, there is more emphasis on the idea of becoming: constantly improving and advancing and evolving, but never actually arriving. To use Mazarr's words, '...we must adjust our mind-sets for an era of constant change and inexorable innovation.' Change, however, is costly. I frequently imagine our Vice-Chancellor and the Pro Vice-Chancellor, Planning and Resources, joined in common prayer, 'Dear Lord, if I give the library a million dollar system, will they be able to reduce staff?' Along with, 'Dear Lord, if I encourage collaboration, will they be able to reduce staff?' We are in the midst of a major change in the way we do our business, and the transforming information world is considerably disruptive for libraries. It causes social stress and psychological strain in addition to the need for increasingly costly infrastructure. To these trends I would add a diminishing sense of place for many transactions. As we become increasingly remote from our clients, many of them will have no 'real' perception of the library as a physical space, nor have library staff an understanding of the clients' spatial reality. A tremendous amount of interaction with businesses today is done via call centres. It used to be the case that one might be connected with a call centre somewhere in one's home country. The current trend in Australia is to establish call centres in off-shore countries, giving staff Australian names in the process. This gives a new dimension to the term off-site. Reconsidering processes in terms of physical locations offers new opportunities to libraries in managing facilities, and offers the possibility of purpose built service centres for clients who will never come into the library. The new service space, as opposed to place, will require technological and communications infrastructures, plus a knowledge base and substantial staff training. Peter Drucker describes what is happening in our society. Every few hundred years in Western history there occurs a sharp transformation. We cross... a 'divide'. Within a few short decades, society rearranges itself - its world view; its basic values; its social and political structure; its arts; its key institutions. Fifty years later there is a new world. ...We are currently living in such a transformation.[3] Corporate trends in today's societyIf Mazarr has identified trends of a society in transition, Robert Baldock[4] has listed the top ten shifts in corporate behaviour that provide the most telling pointers to the future:
We can consider these issues from a library point of view. Broadening of the range of services on offer is taking place daily in libraries: we have electronic reserve, direct document delivery, digitisation of course materials, specialised pages in support of specific units, subject-specific gateway services, computer based information literacy teaching programs, the list is endless. The list is also electronic. The creation of new value propositions is an interesting concept. I have been in several situations where library staff have been asked: 'What business are you in?' And the best response has been, 'The information business'. But what does this mean when circulation staff believe they loan and shelve books rather than making information available, and reference staff are now acknowledging that citations are a form of information, an information address as it were, but clients want the 'real thing'? This is where full text databases, with their capability for end to end services, from access to location to viewing to downloading or printing, are moving libraries into real information supply direct to the user, regardless of location. To continue this train of thought, libraries need to look long and hard at what else they could do. For example, university libraries might form alliances with university bookshops and piggyback on each other's systems. Our library used to run a photocopying service. This evolved to include desktop printing, managing operations for other institutions, and retailing a range of replication supplies, many in direct and unwelcome competition with the university bookstore. The manager of that service kept creating new value propositions, ie new services, in order to ensure his continuing existence. An excellent example of value added services is Microsoft Office. By bundling and integrating applications, Microsoft has created a powerful tool that is genuinely greater than the sum of its parts. The convenience is outstanding. Virtualisation of libraries is with us now, although the preferred option at this point is the hybrid library. Libraries actually have four choices:
Our library is currently in stage two of the process. As part of this we have reached a point where it is necessary to take stock of various existing services and developments, and those soon to be implemented, to consider how they all fit together and what our future configuration will be. Not only are people concerned with the shape and direction of our electronic services, there is substantial pressure to define the relationship of electronic to traditional services, and to ensure that we articulate the value of both. I believe that the traditional services in academic libraries will only last until there is a critical mass of digital material available, particularly with the advent of the electronic book. I also believe we must manage the transition more holistically than we have to date. I would like to return to ways in which libraries get closer to their clients later, but there is a growing corporate strategy that is worth considering; and that is disintermediation or cutting out the middleman, as middlemen by definition act as a barrier between suppliers and their ultimate customers. Toyota motor company is actively exploring selling directly to the buyer, rather than going through dealers. They have created an interactive web page with outstanding follow up. I know, because I picked my last car by searching on the internet. Toyota sent me reams of information, approximately half an inch thick, on each model in which I expressed an interest. This was followed by personal phone calls offering to bring cars to me to test drive. I really appreciated that service, as I did not want to take days of my scarce time to go to car dealers to canvass the market. I would simply like to make one point here, that to many information suppliers libraries are the intermediary between them and the information user. I do not know what the future will bring, but if I were a publisher or a vendor of academic or research information, I would be seriously wondering if I could reach a greater market by going direct. While libraries have grown beyond the belief that they have a monopoly on their users, I am not confident we have acknowledged the very real possibility that our suppliers might simply go around us to our clients. Mergers and acquisitions and demergers today are different from the past in two ways: there are fewer contested takeovers, as most take place between consenting partners, and much of the activity involves the breaking up of old style conglomerates. The logic of large conglomerates was that of ownership and rigid central control of all of their diverse bits, based on the belief that the centre's general management skills could be applied with equal effectiveness to any business. I must admit this strikes a chord in response to my own library's operations across four branches. Our library is centralist in nature, and offers a relatively standardised service, on the grounds that clients expect consistency in all locations, somewhat akin to fast food outlets operating all over the world. However, as time passes, I find myself in greater sympathy with staff in branches who have, over the years, voiced the desire to tailor their services more closely to the needs of their users. Each branch already has its own distinct personality and way of doing things, and now may be the time to capitalise further on this. I believe our clients, who could also be termed our virtual communities, will increasingly expect products tailored to their needs. Libraries, when approaching service development, have normally catered for the mainstream, and electronic services, by their very nature, can promote standardisation. The formation of strategic alliances are radically different from the ways in which libraries traditionally operated. Our library is in partnership with Blackwell's, a partnership centring around the supply of shelf-ready books, a significant joint venture worth millions of dollars. There are several important outcomes, both anticipated and unanticipated, which have arisen from this initiative:
Outsourcing is a strategy libraries have not utilised so much as we might, although we have been using it for years in terms of hiring consultants to determine, analyse, and report on client needs, and increasingly we find ourselves outsourcing training for our staff, particularly in IT areas. On a larger scale, our university has recently outsourced management of its salary sacrifice activities, not I suspect because the service is better, but because the amount of varied packages available to employees will create an administrative demand the university is not prepared to meet. The range of potential opportunities for libraries is great, the time necessary to investigate, initiate, and manage these opportunities is substantial also. Many libraries have flirted with the idea, but there appear to be few marriages to date. Not only are barriers between industries breaking down, so have the barriers created by distance. Globalisation is affecting the higher education industry as many of our institutions scour the globe for new markets. And where the university delivers, so too does the library, in all time zones. The rapid entry of newcomers into old markets can be seen in the library world by two current developments: netLibrary and Questia. NetLibrary[5] aims to provide a single, flexible ordering and service entity with enhanced reporting capabilities including extranet usage statistics. Their employees include professional librarians and people from the publications industry. The netLibrary approach has been as a content provider who will distribute electronic books to libraries. The service mimics traditional library operations and uses Collection Manager as an ordering system, making it easy to relate to netLibrary. The service has focussed on service to libraries because 'no one wants to build up large electronic libraries'. Despite netLibrary's recent financial difficulties, the soundness of the original concept cannot be doubted. In contrast to netLibrary, the Questia service[6] has been aimed at the end consumer. It promises:
Questia's goal is to offer a complete research service and their target market is university students and scholars who will be charged an 'affordable' subscription fee to gain access to an online database of 250 000 books. Even more interesting: Questia has developed a way for publishers to receive revenue each time a student accesses even a single page of a book or journal. This has never been possible before. Thus, older titles and out-of-print books that may have been perused thousands of times in libraries and have not generated any new income will produce new revenues and once again become valuable assets for publishers... This is a win/win situation for publishers. Seventy publishers are said to have given the nod to the system. The Questia model is not unlike that of netLibrary, except that Questia is not selling site licenses to libraries and is also paying publishers by the page view. Whether Questia will be able to deliver on their promise and how successful their service will be remains to be seen; but, as proposed, it is a classic example of eliminating the library middleman by being a new player in an old market. It is also a good example of value added service. In fact, when developing the service, Questia must have asked, 'What do researchers and students do?' and 'How do they do it?' as opposed to 'What information do they need?' The final corporate trend identified by Baldock is customisation. We are moving from standard products to customised products for niche markets. When Levi Strauss will manufacture a tailor made pair of jeans to your personal specifications and BMW allows buyers to extensively determine their car configuration, we have come almost full circle back to a quasi-cottage industry, as information and communication technology allows individual objects to be created in factories designed for mass production. (As a side issue, individually crafted jeans or cars create a relationship between the buyer and the supplier that purchasing off the shelf packages does not.) As librarians, we are well aware that we have a mixture of clients to serve, and the electronic approach allows us to start tailoring services to meet those needs. It is clear that while electronic systems can be used to standardise services, they can also be used to make them flexible and relevant. Niche marketing is an area which university libraries have, to date, not explored to any depth. However, with the concept of scholars' portals, as well as other forms of market segmentation, all this is set to change.
Getting closer to the client Findings indicated that undergraduates have three key needs to be addressed by the division:
Supportive face-to-face relationships which position the student as client were particularly important in the context of the university library and the Student Computing Helpdesk. Students argued that such relationships develop their confidence and competence in the university setting. Students expected the division to ensure adequate and flexible staffing practices to enable quality service from staff. As an aside, it has not been unusual for students when commenting on quality of service from the library to make the observation that the service is good, but that the library needs more staff. The survey report went on to say that managing virtual relationships was becoming an increasingly important skill for students. As well, the capacity to access expanding knowledge bases was highly valued. Students appreciated being able to access services and resources from any place at any time. The QUT data warehouse was given exceptional praise for making centralised and relevant information available in a user-friendly manner. Most importantly, students expected that 'initiatives promoting flexibility, efficiency and convenience will be a feature of future developments in the division'. They appreciated initiatives that support a shift from client service to self-service. However, with this they also expected the division to maintain the capacity for personal relationships with students as an essential complement to the self-service directive. In fact, in every focus group conducted, student relationships with staff were given the greatest emphasis. Gratifyingly, 'The university library was recognised to be the gateway to their success as students.' Investigate client behaviourAn area that has received less attention in recent library literature is investigation into client behaviour. Organisations conducting their business via e-commerce are now using data mining techniques to match up demographics and client needs and they are also tracking and examining electronic transactions. Libraries could do this too, particularly with reference services, or to detect patterns and trends in collection usage, but they appear not to be taking up such opportunities extensively. Possibly this is because real data-mining requires extended software applications or, most probably, because someone somewhere has to then absorb and make sense out of the data collected. It is far easier to collect process data, or ask clients their opinions, than to uncover behaviours and trends through extensive data analysis. It may be time to add new tools to the kit. Client centred designWe achieve client centred services through client assisted design. Personally, I have never considered libraries to be client friendly organisations. Library staff are friendly, but the systems have been cumbersome and complex to use, particularly as completion of a process might involve several steps in several locations culminating in matching up that mysterious entity, the call number, with an item on a shelf. Is it any wonder that today's users embrace electronic versions with alacrity, and probably with relief as well? Library conventions are transparent in the electronic world, and better still, the information can come to you. It is worthwhile noting that a system in which information comes to the client is many times more efficient than one where the client comes to the information. Such efficiency benefits both the client and the library. But to return to the point of client designed services, determining client need is not the same thing as designing the service to meet that need How do we achieve client centred design? Without providing a blueprint, I can identify some of the strategies for increasing the likelihood of useability:
Client relationship managementFinally, in addition to learning more about client behaviours and involving clients in service design, a current trend is on building long term client relationships, referred to as customer relationship management (CRM). CRM means segmenting customers and tailoring services to create value. Our clients really don't care how libraries store information, or that data from different sources must be combined to give them what they want, they don't even care if they call the wrong location. What they do know is that they want good service and they want it now. In industry, with increased competition, globalisation, the growing cost of customer acquisition, and high customer turnover, CRM is viewed as critical to survival. It is one of the reasons for loyalty programs like frequent flyers or fly buys. CRM seeks to understand: who are the clients, what do they do, and what do they like. CRM is defined as an integrated marketing and service strategy that depends on coordinated actions. Universities have a long history of building relationships with graduates, businesses, and other sectors of the community where mutual benefit can be identified. Libraries have not operated on this level but the concept of managing client relationships goes beyond client service. I found this quote from e-Business Roadmap for Success interesting: Most companies consider themselves customer focused, but in reality, they're product-centric. Meanwhile, e-commerce has increased customer expectations, and customer expectations have raised the bar on service levels.[7] Strategic planning for the virtual libraryVirtual libraries need strategic planning as much as hard copy libraries. Successful models for e-libraries will be unified and user-centric. They will focus on clients, marketing, and competitive positioning as much as on internal operations. We are already familiar with planning processes which involve tracking changing environments, understanding user needs, and formulating strategies and implementation plans to meet those needs. This whole exercise also needs to be done with an electronic perspective in mind. ConclusionNow is not an easy time for library service provision. Given today's society where speed and convenience are becoming paramount to our virtual communities, ours is the task of implementing top quality client service that is consistent with our users' experience in the rest of their lives. We cannot view our systems and practices in isolation. What are some of the strategies for successful transition to electronic mode?
As I finish, let me tell you a short story. My car needed some repairs, and as it is a company car I needed to go through the relevant processes. As this is not an unusual situation for me, I had learned the various procedures for managing a car repair in the QUT environment, but now it is outsourced, and I was directed to a company web page. I didn't feel confident with the information available, so I phoned the person listed as the contact. I explained my problem and the conversation then went like this- the contact: 'We have a web page.' And so it went. The irony is that their web page was not that bad, but their service was terrible. My penultimate point is that an organisation should, at all costs, avoid the tendency to believe that once an automated service is established the job is done. A library should never rely solely on electronic services without backing them up with people who can handle a query or problem. And my final point is, never allow a staff member to back up an electronic service without ensuring they live and breathe polite, courteous, high quality client service. This paper is based on a presentation given at the 21[st] Annual Conference of the International Association of Technological University Libraries, Brisbane, July, 2000. Notes
See also J Meyrowitz No Sense of Place: The Impact of Electronic Media on Social Behaviour New York Oxford 1985, and E Turban et al Electronic Commerce: A Managerial Perspective Upper Saddle River NJ Prentice Hall 2000. Jan Novak, director, Library Services, Queensland University of Technology, GPO Box 2434, Brisbane Queensland. E-mail queries can be directed through: g.austen@qut.edu.au.nospam (please remove the '.nospam' from the address). |
|||||
|